I’m not giving my name, but so what.
I’m an atheist, an avid music fan and reader, and – most of all – an asshole.
I like to complain and insult idiots.
Here’s my story, which seems to be a requirement in the world of religious blogging – I was raised a pseduofundamentalist Roman Catholic who slowly began finding cracks in his religion’s facade. I eventually switched to neopaganism. When I outgrew that, I looked back at Christianity through my newly objective eyes and realized what a joke it was. I was then a secular deist for a small amount of time.
I began reading more atheist materials in recent years which solidifed my atheism.
There you go.
Enjoy the blog.
Have a nice day !
It is fun to complain and insult each other; but after a long while we get bored and we start to like each other. Then we can go bug someone else, right?
Yeah I don’t really hold grudges once these arguments are all said and done, so I dont hate you right now.
But, yeah, we can go bug someone else whenever we want since our feud is currently over.
Ha ha, let’s go bug some people who claim to be “Christian”, some of them are getting on my nerves.
[...] About Me ← The Irrational Atheist [...]
hell, all christians get on my nerves
you forgot to add you are GOD!
haha how could I forget that?
You sound a lot like my husband! I’m not sure if that is a good thing…
Well if you married him… lol
I’m gonna take that as a compliment.
I was a secular deist for a while when I was younger. What made you make the switch?
Just reading more into atheist texts and learning more about religion.
I was mostly just a deist to be able to say I wasn’t godless. I didn’t REALLY buy it, I don’t think.
Yeah, there really isnt much to buy. The whole time that I claimed the label I sort of felt like I was taking the easy way out by picking and choosing. Deism turned out to be nothing but a front for my laziness.
My deism was more just being in denial that I was really an atheist.
Deism-The belief, based solely on reason, in a God who created the universe and then abandoned it, assuming no control over life, exerting no influence on natural phenomena, and giving no supernatural revelation
So that is what the hell you two are talking about. I never knew what deist meant.
Now you do. Congrats!
lol thanks Chris, btw i have a new post, should have another later
I’ll check it out.
Chill, you aren’t from Seattle by chance are you?
Lots of things in my life coming up about Seattle, so I thought I’d ask. If you are not, then that’s fantastic.
Thanks,
Chris
Nope, I’m from Omaha, but it does get nicknamed “the next Seattle.”
Ok thanks
I CHALLENGE TO AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG TO SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE THAT THE ARGUMENT BELOW IS WRONG.
The problem with trusting in Richard Dawkins is, he’s not a real scientist. No real scientist would ever say there is no God, because of three very specific scientific reasons noted below. If Dawkins doesn’t know if there is a God, then he say so; otherwise, he’s plainly just a liar and a fraud:
1) There is no evidence that there is no God, thus it is scientifically irrational to say so.
2) There is no known evidence that any object or substance has ever come into being by it’s own volition, without something else apart from that object or substance, being involved in the process.
3) There is no evidence that anything in motion has ever come to be in motion by itself, without something else first causing it to be put in motion. (Quite obviously, Socrates, Newton and Einstein, who all three believed in God, could argue circles around Dawkins, as can also, any grade school child with half a brain.)
Thus, the entire position of Richard Dawkins is scientifically, fundamentally flawed to the core. There is no such thing as “science” that is not based on evidence.
Nobody knows exactly who or exactly how, the pyramids in Egypt came to be as we can observe them today. Richard Dawkins and every other scientist, archaeologist and human being with half a brain, just assumes that someone designed and built them. This is because, all known evidence and human experience indicates that someone did.
And much more so, all known evidence and human experience by default, indicates there is a Creator or Creators. Thus, the correct scientific position is, there is a Creator or Creators until someone can prove otherwise, just as A squared plus B squared is true regarding isosceles triangles, until someone can prove otherwise and, just as the pyramids of Egypt are a product of design until someone can prove otherwise.
Anyone who pretends there is no Creator is complete liar, an obvious charlatan and a fraud, no matter how many Oxford degrees they may or may not honestly possess.
And you think George Bush is a moron; he’s only a beginner ! ! !