The Final Word on Angryxtian

When my silly little war of words with Angryxtian began, I could almost see a sort of sardonic humor to the whole affair, the way he would layer lies upon each other and call liberals retards and what have you.

Well, at this point, I’ve had enough. Angryxtian just makes me sick. This will be my final post regarding him and I suppose that after this I will just have to trust that anyone who reads his blog can see him for what he is.

Anyway, here is his most recent round of hate against me and my subsequent responses:

[After I say that refusing to deny Jesus when held at gunpoint with that being the requirement to save your life is a trivial thing to die for, especially since you could ask for forgiveness later...]

Angryxtian says…

“”Typical ignornat filth: “How is martyrdom over something so trivial anything to be emulated or proud of?”

You think it’s so trivial, you try it. Just like how you beg Christians not to take penicillin our God invented [note from chill - "to cure the diseases your god invented?"] ( and that you also use, owing to oour good graces ) and pray for a hollocost of Christians, if you want to ste an example telling people how trivila it is to eat a bullet in defense of your everlasting faith, prove it to us. Or shut up and rspect the dead’”

>>I would like to start out my response by pointing out that the second part of his comment is referring to my “2^nd Christian Challenge,” where I asked Christians why they don’t give up shopping, medicine, and technology if God will take care of them and our earthly existences don’t matter.

Angryxtian, who has shown time and time again that he has no sense of humor or irony, is here misconstruing my hypothetical, irony-tinged post as if I actually want Christians to give up medicine, shopping, and technology. Of course I don’t - they would all die, as no god exists to provide for them. Anyone who actually did such a thing at my suggestion is clearly mentally unstable.

He then rants about how I should get killed over atheism to prove my point and that I want to start a Christian Holocaust.

Now, if I personally were in Columbine and the kids shooting happened to be Christian and put a gun to my head and said “Accept Jesus as your Lord and savior or you die here and now,” I would say I accepted Jesus in a minute. That’s just basic survival skills. Angryxtian would be the one with his “divine knowledge” splattered all over the wall. Is this because I am a coward or because Angryxtian is noble, or is it because I don’t have a death wish? I’ll side with the latter.

As for his Holocaust accusation, I have already addressed the fact that the 2^nd Christian Challenge is an ironic tease, a hypothetical dare used to make a valid point. Unfortunately, it is hard for someone who believes that the Bible is literal, historic truth to understand that not everything everyone says is literal.

…

[Angryxtian dropped this one after I said that him putting Obama alongside Snoop Dogg, a convicted felon and gang member, was to make Obama look bad. Xtian said in that specific post that there were t-shirts made saying "Obama is an Emcee," so he called Obama a gangster rapper and then put his name alongside that of a criminal gangster, instead of an emcee who is actively campaigning for him that has no criminal record, like Common or will.i.am. He insists that I am just an ignorant hater for pointing that out.]

Angryxtian said:

“If you [k]now rap better than I do ( as you claim ) then you deliberately misinterpreted my works just to hav something to get mad at. What’s the mattr? You can’t find anything to blog about without putting words in Christian’s mouths??????

For shame.

Typical athiest garbage. When you’ve been called out on many of your lies you claim it’s only one. When it’s been shown how you played dumb, pretnded not to hav knowledge you now claim, your retort is to call Christians ignorant instead of simply admitting the truth of the matter.

Sir, their are many athiests who are at least intellictually honest in there conversations. You are not one of those. You’re nothing but a shrill whiner, resorting to personal attacks at the expens of even trying to find the truth you reject out of hand in Christianity. In short, you ar a fraud.”

>>No, I did not alter his spelling or grammar to make him look worse.

Now, I honestly don’t know what the hell he’s talking about through most of this. I didn’t play dumb, I made valid points, I have been as honest as I can, and as for personal attacks, he means how I called him ignorant.

By comparison, here is a brief list of the personal attacks, lies, accusations, and hateful generalizations Angryxtian has used on his blog and in comments to me:

“Hateful sinner,” “shrill whiner,” “fraud,” saying I have “insane hatred,” “a liberal is a faux intellectual,” “liberal retard,” “homosexual” (he is homophobic, so you know), humanists are “pulling our society into the gutter,” “It’s OK to be a junkie drug addict and a prostitute as long as you’re an atheist these days,” “the secular politically correct army thinks sex should be encouraged in kindergarten,” “atheists are ignorant” (the same insult he yelled at me using against him!), “Atheists recognize their own ignorance, at some level, and it bothers them,” atheist are mad, upset, unhappy, and jealous; atheism is a “nasty cause” (this is accompanied by a picture of a nerdy, sickly child reading manga and typing something), “atheists want to turn America into a communist country,” “liberal idiot,” “atheists are bullies,” “Christians are more trustworthy than heathens,” “Angry Communist Liberal Uglys,” the ACLU defends nazis and is against Christian rights, atheists “really just want to make our society as wicked as possible,” “Liberals and athiests love Nazis and hate Christians,” political cartoons “just encourage the children to turn away from the faith and from all that’s right with the world,” about Christians, he says “we’re better as a people than athiests and pagens and muslims,” he calls Bill  Clinton “a sex fiend,” he says that liberals get married at 17 for sex and then divorce to do drugs, “stupid fool,” “gay ain’t OK,” “liberals are ignorant,” “God sent a plague among the gays,” liberals are trying to destroy marriage, if the liberals get their way, your kids will turn gothic and cut their wrists, “Ted Kennedy is a murderer”…

And, honestly, at that point I just couldn’t stand to read any more of his posts to find more examples. Please note that I only read a page and a half of his blog, plus a few of his comments to me, to find all of these examples, and I left off his racial slur (n-ga) and most of his homophobic rants.

Wow. Just look at that length - we are obviously dealing with a hateful bigot here with one hell of an agenda.

Now, you could look at my own blog and point out that I’ve said things like “god is an asshole” or “christians annoy me,” bur I’ve always tried to back up such statements and many of my comments - like god is an asshole - are meant as sarcasm or irony and are humorous in context.

Angryxtian’s above words read in context the way they do out of context - hateful and uninformed.

Summarily, Angryxtian’s previously recounted argument is hypocritical, abundant with straw men and ad hominems, and completely avoiding the issue he is pretending to address.

…

Additionally, Angryxtian decries atheists and scientists as communist potsmoking idiots, but he obviously has no or very little comprehension of their arguments. I now refer to a post he made about Richard Dawkin’s “The Selfish Gene” book and his response to a comment I made on the post asking him what he thinks Dawkins is trying to say.

…

Angryxtian said:

” “More ordinarily, selfish behavior may consist simply in refusing to share some valued resource such as sexual partners.”

That’s by the athiest “God” Dick Dawkins. I didn’t believe it myself until someone showed it to me, but it’s right there in black and white in The Selfish Gene Chapter 1.”

[I ask him to clarify what he thinks Dawkins is trying to say...]

“If you can’t understand one simple sentence, your educators are failing you miserally, and you should take yourself somewhere you can gt a qaulity education. It’s really th most basic reading comprehension and if you can’t understand this its no onder you gt so much else rong.”

…

>>OK, since he responded to my request to clarify what he thought Dawkins was trying to say by essentially calling me stupid and semi-illiterate (while misspelling the word “wrong”), I am going to assume he thought Dawkins was saying that not sharing your sexual partners with others is selfish in a moral sense.

Here’s what Dawkins actually meant.

The book “The Selfish Gene” is Dawkin’s brilliant idea that we are programmed with “selfish genes” - genes that program us to do all we can to help them reproduce and stay in existence because they are “selfish” and just care about their own survival and reproduction.

That is why, for example, we are so close to our family members - we are programmed that way because we know that they share our genes and we try to take special care of them and be close to them because they can keep our selfish genes reproducing.

What Dawkins meant was that a reason we don’t share sexual partners is that our genes know that doing so would help OTHER genes reproduce and stay in existence when our selfish genes only want to reproduce themselves and keep themselves in existence.

By this sentence, Dawkins doesn’t mean “you are being a selfish person if you don’t share sex partners,” he means “our selfish genes don’t incline us to share sex partners because doing so doesn’t preserve our own genes and preserves other genes instead.”

…

Summarily, Angryxtian does not understand basic science, lies to make points, and usually just ignores any counter-arguments or responds with insults, lies, and generalizations.

…

And that’s the final word on that.

Here is my complete collection of anti-Angryxtian posts to further show you how you can’t take him seriously.

http://chillinatthecabstand.wordpress.com/2008/03/31/for-everyones-sake-ending-angryxtians-bullshit/

http://chillinatthecabstand.wordpress.com/2008/03/31/re-angryxtian-calling-me-a-liar/

http://chillinatthecabstand.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/re-angryxtian-calling-me-a-liar-again/

http://chillinatthecabstand.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/2nd-christian-challenge-give-up-medicine/

---

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

• For Everyone’s Sake (Ending Angryxtian’s Reign of Terror)
• #4 at Sandwalk