Re: Angryxtian Calling Me A Liar

 Check my second to last post.

Also, check his site to see that I’m not lying.

 http://ignorantchristian.wordpress.com 

… 

ANGRYXTIAN’S RESPONSE TO MY POST ABOUT HIS UNRELIABILITY:

“Wow, you mad so much up about me it’s not even funny. I espected this though.

I never said Barak is a gangster. I said he’s a gangsta rapper. That’s a faux gangstr like a libral is a faux intellectual. Duh. Just because the two use one of the same words, if they wre the same thing they’d have the same name. But it’s just like a athiest I guess.

I didn’t say junkies are going to ha sexual relations with evryone’s grandma.

I didn’t say God want’s us to use Windows, I don’t think he really care’s about technical garbage. I us a Apple. What I said was Windows is at last capitalism.

But athiests don’t want to respond to what I actually said it’s much easier to just make stuff up about me and rspond to that instead.

I never said scientists have bug eyes.

I also didn’t said college students are all gays drug addicts. I said th universety teaches them how to become these things.

Your friend Spider Man [ed. note - that's his nickname for Josh - http://shidemn.wordpress.com] complained I sent him a take back but I looked on Yahoo and that’s a thing that makes it easy for someone to know you’re talking about them. It said that comes in your WordPress dashboard. Since I get so many commnts on God’s blog could you send a take back next time you want me to grace your web site so I’ll know? Thanks!”

 …

MY RESPONSE (what he says is in regular text and quotes; what I say is bolded and preceded by >>):

“I never said Barak is a gangster. I said he’s a gangsta rapper. That’s a faux gangstr like a libral is a faux intellectual. Duh. Just because the two use one of the same words, if they wre the same thing they’d have the same name. But it’s just like a athiest I guess.”

>>Ever since Snoop Dogg’s murder trial and Pac’s drive-by death, the thin line between gangsta rapper and gangster is almost non-existent. Also, note that you said “gangster” instead of “gangsta” (there is a difference) and put Snoop Dogg’s name alongside Barack Obama. Snoop Dogg is a rapper as well as a convicted drug dealer and user (including cocaine charges), driver in a drive-by, assaulter, and unlawful possessor of weapons. Using Snoop in an example completely eliminates the line between gangster and rapper, making it incredibly difficult to tell that you are not saying he is a gangster, or at least a criminal. Additionally, the shirts said “Obama is an Emcee,” so why not put just “rapper” or “MC”? Because ultra-conservatives like yourself can’t tell the difference between “gangster” and “rapper.”

Also, I haven’t heard Snoop preaching the word of Obama from the mountaintops. Again, you were using him to associate Obama with a convicted felon, instead of mentioning his ultra-vocal supporters who are also rappers, like Common or will.i.am, who have no felony charges.

 … 

“I didn’t say junkies are going to hav sexual relations with evryone’s grandma.”

>>Oh, you’re right! You actually said “aging mother in law.” So, people are going to shoot up heroin and have sex in front of your mother-in-law. How’s that any better? (Note: I corrected that in the original post)

…

“I didn’t say God want’s us to use Windows, I don’t think he really care’s about technical garbage. I us a Apple. What I said was Windows is at last capitalism.”

>>I’m going to let your own words speak for themselves here. You clearly specify that Linux is communist and against God and not for Christians because they aren’t potsmoking liberal communists.

“I was browsing through the Christian blogs on Word Press and somehow I found this doozey. It’s about a computer program called Linux. That’s where a bunch of librals sit around computer programming all day smoking the marijuana and then give it all away. It’s all about not having private property.

But I guess Linux doesn’t get computer viruses made by athiests in Europe. Neither does Mac, and it’s not communist! Besides they aren’t for Christians – I never got one. We don’t go to porn al day on the internet. So basically the computer communists have one good thing and they stole it from Christians and Mac.

If you look at this blog you can see it’s all about destroying capitalism. That’s true at the end of hte day. So even if Windows is a stupid computer program it’s part of capitalism, and that’s the best thing we’ve got. Capitalism is human nature, handed down from God directly. Why would a bunch of computer geeks want to destroy that? Because they’re antisocial, I guess. And liberals just love communism!“ 

… 

“But athiests don’t want to respond to what I actually said it’s much easier to just make stuff up about me and rspond to that instead.”

>>No, I’m responding to what you actually said, which is stupider than anything I could have made up. Also, for further reference, what you are describing is a “straw man” argument, where someone fabricates or twists someone’s words and argues those false words instead. I’m using your actual words and views, though – not straw men.

… 

“I never said scientists have bug eyes.”

>>I didn’t say you did. The cartoon you sponsor clearly depicts them with crazy bug eyes, making them look like psychopaths. It’s the theist equivalent of a Nazi cartoon with a big-nosed Jew (but not as offensive). I forgot to note this in my previous post, but you say “The jokes on the terrorists and scientists,” and since the cartoon is just about scientists, it doesn’t take a brilliant mind to realize that you are pretty much calling scientists terrorists.

http://ignorantchristian.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/the-jokes-on-them/

…

“I also didn’t said college students are all gays drug addicts. I said th universety teaches them how to become these things.”

>>If universities teach them to be gay, sexually active drug addicted heathens, then anyone taught by such universities must be a gay, sexually active drug addicted heathen. Similarly, if someone puts red food coloring in a glass of water, the water turns red. You also say to keep Christian kids out of non-Christian colleges to keep them away from the gay drug users. That just reinforces the truth that you are calling college students gay drug using heathens.

And, just for the record, Islam is a religion, too, and philosophy classes study religions. Not just yours.

Again, what you said…

“It’s amazing. Students are literally being forced into classes that make them read verses from the Koran! This is outrageous. Somehow turning people away from [ed. note: Christian] faith is supposed to be tolerance. The more we turn away from God the worse society gets. More godlessness is the liberal’s answer like they drink to cure a hang over.

And what do they learn at the university? Unprotected sex. Coddling to protect their self esteem. Indoctrination to the gay agenda. Kids at college these days are actually taught to have gay friends because it makes them look “cool” and “diverse” and “tolerant.”

( This is a backdoor tactic, I promise you. Just like medical marijuana is code for liberals being able to smoke drugs legally, but in slow motion because moral people are offended at the idea, so they have to try and sneak it by us like that. )”

 …

That’s that.  I did add my own sarcastic humor to your words, but left what you said intact. Deal with it. Also, for anyone reading this, note everything he didn’t even pretend I made up and how idiotic and offensive it is.